Nasal eosinophilia as a preliminary discriminative biomarker of non-allergic rhinitis in every day clinical pediatric practice.

BACKGROUND: Non-allergic rhinitis (NAR) in children, named local allergic rhinitis (LAR) and non-allergic rhinitis with eosinophilia syndrome (NARES), are recently termed entities in childhood characterized by symptoms suggestive of allergic rhinitis in the absence of systemic atopy. Nasal eosinophils (nEo) are the principal cells involved in the allergy inflammation and nasal allergen provocation test is the gold standard method for the diagnosis, albeit with several limitations. The aim of this study was to validate the presence of nEo in combination with the therapeutic response to nasal steroids, as a preliminary discriminator of NAR in real life data. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, 128 children (63.3% male, aged 72 ± 42 m) with history of NAR were enrolled and followed up for 52 ± 32 m. Nasal cytology was performed and nasal steroids trial was recommended initially in all and repeatedly in relapsing cases. Response to therapy was clinically evaluated using 10-VAS. RESULTS: Significant nEo was found in 59.3% of the cases and was related to reported dyspnea episodes. 23.4% had no response to therapy, whereas 51.5% were constantly good responders. Response to therapy was related to nEo and a cutoff point of 20% was defined as the most reliable biological marker with 94% sensitivity and 77% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: In children with symptoms of NAR, the presence of nEo > 20% constantly responding to nasal steroid therapy, is a clear indicator of atopy. In an everyday clinical setting, it emerged as an easy, preliminary, cell biomarker suggestive of further investigation such as NAPT, to discriminate LAR from NARES.

Chronic Spontaneous and Inducible Urticaria Associated With Mycoplasma pneumoniae Infection.

Acute childhood urticaria is a common disorder that has been associated with infections. In a few children, it may last for more than six weeks, thereafter it is characterized as chronic urticaria (CU). We report two cases, one suffering from chronic spontaneous urticaria and one chronic inducible urticarias (dermographism and cold urticaria). Both children had concomitant respiratory symptoms that were associated with Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP) infection. Urticarias' symptoms and signs were refractory to regular antihistamines dose but showed marked improvement or complete resolution following clarithromycin administration. CU response to antibiotics pointed strongly to a potential causative role of MP in the pathogenesis of chronic spontaneous and chronic inducible urticarias. It is not clear if MP was the etiopathogenic cause or just the trigger. Nevertheless, refractory to antihistamines urticarias associated with MP infection may respond to antibiotics, which should be considered as an alternative therapeutic approach.

Allergy skin testing in predicting adverse reactions to fluorescein: a prospective clinical study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate allergy skin testing as a diagnostic tool of adverse reactions to fluorescein and whether allergy and previous sodium fluorescein angiography (SFA) act as predisposing factors. METHODS: Patients with adequate indication for fluorescein angiography and normal skin responsiveness were subjected to allergy skin-prick and intradermal tests for fluorescein, followed by SFA. During SFA, adverse reactions were monitored and classified as mild, moderate or severe. Previous SFAs and adverse reactions as well as the presence of atopy were also registered. RESULTS: One thousand and thirty-seven patients were enrolled in the study and 1284 SFAs were executed. Forty-four patients (4.3%) developed 55 adverse reactions; among them 50 (3.8%) were mild, three (0.2%) moderate and two (0.16%) severe. None of the reactors produced positive skin tests to fluorescein. Patients with atopy and previous SFAs were not more susceptible to adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: The vast majority of adverse reactions to fluorescein are mild and not attributed to immunological mechanisms. Allergy skin tests cannot predict non-immunological reactions but their utility remains substantial in predicting anaphylaxis during SFAs and must be performed in patients reporting risk factors in their past medical history.

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) triggered by a spider bite.

BACKGROUND: Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a rare and severe cutaneous reaction usually triggered by drugs. Other causative factors such as viral infections are rarely involved. In this study, we report a case of AGEP caused by a spider bite. CASE SUMMARY: A 56-year-old woman was referred to the allergy unit after a spider bite at the left popliteal fossa, while gardening, 5 days earlier. The offending spider was captured and identified by an entomologist as belonging to the Loxosceles rufescens species. No acute reaction was observed; however, after 24 hours, due to the occurrence of typical dermonecrotic skin lesions associated with erythema and edema, Cefuroxime and Clindamycin were administered intramuscularly after medical advice was given. Almost 72 hours after the spider bite, an erythematous and partly edematous eruption appeared locally in the gluteus area bilaterally, which progressively expanded to the trunk, arms and femors. Within 24 hours dozens of small, pinhead sized, non-follicular pustules were present, mainly in the folds. The patient complained of a burning sensation of the skin in addition to pruritus; and simultaneously had a fever of 38-39 degrees C as the eruption expanded. DISCUSSION: A spider bite may represent a possible causative factor of AGEP. A spider's venom contains sphingomyelinase that stimulates the release of IL8 and GM-CSF, which are involved in AGEP pathogenesis. Whether or not the con-current use of antibiotics has an effect in AGEP appearance when combined with a spider's venom, cannot be excluded.